AI

ox-alpha: The Free Stealth Model on OpenRouter (and Why Everyone Says GLM-5.3)

Dark cover: the codename ox-alpha beside a glowing blue fingerprint dissolving into particles - the anonymous stealth model traced by its tokenizer

On 20 August 2026 a frontier-class AI model appeared on OpenRouter with no company name attached to it. It is called ox-alpha, it is free for about a week, it reads text, images and video - and nobody who built it will admit to it. We pointed it at a real production task the day it dropped. Here is what it is, what it can do, and the increasingly convincing case for who is behind it.

What ox-alpha actually is

OpenRouter lists it under the provider name “Stealth” and calls it a reasoning model for coding, sustained agentic work and production workloads. In plain terms: a capable, general-purpose model aimed squarely at software engineering.

$0free on OpenRouter during the preview window
1.05Mtoken context window, up to 131K output
text · image · videomultimodal input, tuned for coding and agents

It went live on 20 August 2026, and the OpenCode team ran a parallel promotion putting it at zero cost for the following week, with rate limits generous enough that they called it “near-unlimited.” The unusual part is the data policy: the provider states that prompts and completions are not used for training - OpenCode calls it zero data retention - which is rare for a stealth release. You can reach it right now through the OpenRouter API or playground, or through OpenCode in a terminal, under the model ID stealth/ox-alpha.

Try it while it’s free: the model lives at openrouter.ai/stealth/ox-alpha. The free window opened on 20 August 2026 and was set to run about a week; pricing after that has not been announced.

So who made it?

Nobody has confirmed anything. But two labs keep coming up - and one of them has the receipts.

Z.ai / GLM-5.3 - the fingerprint case

A developer known as dax ran a tokenizer test across 25 prompts; ox-alpha’s token counts matched Z.ai’s GLM-5.3 exactly, off by a constant 75-token wrapper each time. A separate analysis matched ox-alpha’s full OpenRouter API contract - seven fields at once - to GLM-5.3 alone out of more than 400 models. Z.ai has been pushing GLM toward vision, which fits ox-alpha’s image and video support.

Xiaomi / MiMo - the precedent case

Xiaomi’s MiMo team has done exactly this before: MiMo-V2-Pro ran on OpenRouter as “Hunter Alpha” before Xiaomi claimed it at launch. ox-alpha’s spec sheet - a million-token context, native multimodality, an obvious lean toward agentic coding - matches the shape of what Xiaomi has been shipping.

Fact versus interpretation

The tokenizer and API-contract matches are real, reproducible measurements, and they prove shared lineage - almost certainly the GLM 5 generation. They do not prove ox-alpha is literally GLM-5.3, and no one at Z.ai, Xiaomi or OpenRouter has confirmed a thing. Treat the attribution as strong pattern-matching, not fact. One more clue points the same way: ox-alpha trips on the same “dirty token” that has previously snagged Qwen and GLM-family models, which - if it holds - points at a Chinese lab regardless of which one.

We tested it the day it dropped

Speculation is cheap, so we ran ox-alpha against real work. We handed it - and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 - the identical brief for a secure, multi-tenant incident-intake app: specification first, then implementation, then a security review. Afterwards we attacked what each one built.

ox-alpha was fast and startlingly cheap: it finished in about an hour on roughly a fifth of the tokens, and produced a correct, readable application. But its isolation between customer organizations was a convention rather than a mechanism - one forgotten predicate would leak silently, a gap its own security notes admit - it wrote no tests, and its interface needed a manual reload after every change. Fable did the slower, more expensive, more thorough job. On a security build, that difference is the whole game.

See the full head-to-head: the exact prompt, the metrics, the screenshots and the scores are on our secure multi-tenant build benchmark, and everything we know about the model - including the identity evidence - sits on the ox-alpha model page.

Why a free stealth model shows up at all

ox-alpha did not appear in a vacuum. Over the past year the share of tokens processed by US models on OpenRouter has fallen from around 70% to roughly 30%, with Chinese labs - DeepSeek, Tencent, Xiaomi, Z.ai - taking the rest. A free, high-context, multimodal stealth drop is exactly the move that accelerates that shift: developers get a frontier-class model at no cost, and whichever lab is behind it collects a week of real-world usage data before it has to attach a price or a name.

Quick answers

Is ox-alpha free?

Yes, during the preview window that opened on 20 August 2026 - OpenCode put it at $0 for about a week with generous limits. Pricing after the window has not been announced.

What is ox-alpha?

An anonymous “stealth” reasoning model on OpenRouter, built for coding and agentic work, with a ~1M-token context and text, image and video input. The provider is undisclosed during the preview.

Is ox-alpha GLM-5.3?

Probably from that family. Independent tokenizer and API-contract fingerprinting both point at Z.ai’s GLM 5 line, most likely GLM-5.3 - but no one has confirmed it, and Xiaomi’s MiMo is a live alternative theory.

Is it safe to send it real prompts?

The provider states prompts and completions are not used for training. As with any third-party endpoint, don’t send secrets - but by the stated policy this one is unusually clean for a stealth release.

Weighing a new model for real work? That is most of what we do - we put frontier models through actual production tasks before we trust them with client code. If you are deciding what to build on, let’s talk.

Want to build something together?

We're always happy to talk products, architecture and AI.

Let's talk

More insights

A rising performance curve and abstract comparison panel illustrating Grok 4.6 price-performance economicsAI

Grok 4.6 Just Broke the Price of Frontier AI

Grok 4.6 matches GPT-5.6 Sol on an independent index at $2/$6 per million tokens. The benchmarks, caveats, Grok Bot, and Cursor deal.

Multi-tenant architecture for SaaS - choosing between Pool, Silo, and Bridge isolation modelsProduct Development

Multi-Tenant Architecture for SaaS: Isolation, Scale, and Costs That Support PLG in IL/US/EU

Pool, Silo, or Bridge? Design multi-tenant SaaS for PLG: tenant isolation, low cost-per-tenant, and IL/US/EU compliance without a painful rewrite.

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol - parallel orchestration versus a modular research engineAI

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Our Coding Verdict

Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol for coding: benchmarks favor Sol, but our real-world tests still put Claude Code ahead in orchestration.

How much does it cost to build a SaaS product in 2026 - price ranges and cost driversProduct Development

How Much Does It Cost to Build a SaaS Product in 2026?

How much does it cost to build a SaaS product in 2026? Real price ranges, from a NIS 15,000 MVP to a full platform, and what truly drives the cost.

How much an AI agent costs for business - off-the-shelf bot vs custom agent pricingAI

How Much Does an AI Agent Cost for Business in 2026?

AI agent cost compared for 2026: subscription bots vs engineered agents, a three-tier price guide, how to calculate ROI, and where businesses overpay.

Offshore developers vs a local boutique software house - cost vs riskProduct Development

Offshore Developers vs a Local Boutique Software House: Cost vs Risk

Offshore developers look cheap on paper, but the real cost hides rework, timezone gaps and IP risk. An honest compare with a local boutique software house.

AI agents for business - an agent network connected to business systemsAI

AI Agents for Business: What They Can Actually Do in 2026

What AI agents can really do for your business today: real use cases from customer service to operations, what they cost, and what still does not work.

App development cost in 2026: up to 80% savings with AIApp Development

How Much Does App Development Cost in Israel in 2026?

Real 2026 app development price ranges, what actually drives cost, and how AI-based development can cut the price by up to 80%.

AI engineeringAI

Specialized AI Firm or In-House AI Engineer? A Business Guide

An AI firm with deep implementation experience or an in-house engineer? Compare cost, time to market, cross-industry experience, and risk.